Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이경열-
dc.date.available2021-02-22T12:47:30Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-
dc.identifier.issn1598-091X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/12014-
dc.description.abstractThe reality of the criminal legislation can be summarized as the following:Hard criminal code has led to the production of special criminal code. The special criminal code is legislated only focusing on the convenience of application. special criminal, however, usually provide harsher punishments than the criminal code, and the degree of the criminal penalties is excessively relentless compared with that of the criminals. Aggravation factors of the special criminal are out of balance and vague. Many provisions of the special criminal code overlapped with those of the criminal code and they finally caused confusion of application, decrease of norm power of the criminal code, inconvenience of reading acts and decrease of certainty. Special criminal about aggravated punishments especially came from a concept: the strongest punishment is the most efficient way to prevent crimes. It, however, brought serious side effects to criminal practices (or affairs) by abusing strong punishments unnecessarily. Even though we create special criminal repetitively to deal with newly emerging crimes, we cannot prevent all of the crimes perfectly. To keep out from those side effects, special criminal which are too strong - and are occasionally replating the existing criminal code - should be included in the existing criminal code by certain standards and procedures. From this perspective, first up, it should be sincerely considered whether a new special code legislation is really necessary, reasonable and it can rightly function or not. Secondly (and in particular), newly emerging crimes should be controled not by newly legislated special criminal code but by the existing criminal code with amendment. In conclusion, these tries and efforts only can prevent the criminal code from withering its own power, eliminate the chaotic criminal code system and ultimately guarantee its effectiveness.-
dc.format.extent28-
dc.language한국어-
dc.language.isoKOR-
dc.publisher한국비교형사법학회-
dc.title형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초-
dc.title.alternativeProblematical reality of the criminal legislation in Korea-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.23894/kjccl.2012.14.2.010-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation비교형사법연구, v.14, no.2, pp 205 - 232-
dc.citation.title비교형사법연구-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage205-
dc.citation.endPage232-
dc.identifier.kciidART001723063-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSpecial criminal code-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorprinciple of legality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstatute of limitation for prosecution-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorprohibition of ex post-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorne bis in idem-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor특별형법-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor죄형법정주의-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor공소시효-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor소급효금지의 원칙-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor일사부재리-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
법과대학 > 법학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE