형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이경열 | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22T12:47:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-091X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/12014 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The reality of the criminal legislation can be summarized as the following:Hard criminal code has led to the production of special criminal code. The special criminal code is legislated only focusing on the convenience of application. special criminal, however, usually provide harsher punishments than the criminal code, and the degree of the criminal penalties is excessively relentless compared with that of the criminals. Aggravation factors of the special criminal are out of balance and vague. Many provisions of the special criminal code overlapped with those of the criminal code and they finally caused confusion of application, decrease of norm power of the criminal code, inconvenience of reading acts and decrease of certainty. Special criminal about aggravated punishments especially came from a concept: the strongest punishment is the most efficient way to prevent crimes. It, however, brought serious side effects to criminal practices (or affairs) by abusing strong punishments unnecessarily. Even though we create special criminal repetitively to deal with newly emerging crimes, we cannot prevent all of the crimes perfectly. To keep out from those side effects, special criminal which are too strong - and are occasionally replating the existing criminal code - should be included in the existing criminal code by certain standards and procedures. From this perspective, first up, it should be sincerely considered whether a new special code legislation is really necessary, reasonable and it can rightly function or not. Secondly (and in particular), newly emerging crimes should be controled not by newly legislated special criminal code but by the existing criminal code with amendment. In conclusion, these tries and efforts only can prevent the criminal code from withering its own power, eliminate the chaotic criminal code system and ultimately guarantee its effectiveness. | - |
dc.format.extent | 28 | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
dc.publisher | 한국비교형사법학회 | - |
dc.title | 형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Problematical reality of the criminal legislation in Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.23894/kjccl.2012.14.2.010 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 비교형사법연구, v.14, no.2, pp 205 - 232 | - |
dc.citation.title | 비교형사법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 205 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 232 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001723063 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Special criminal code | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | principle of legality | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | statute of limitation for prosecution | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | prohibition of ex post | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ne bis in idem | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 특별형법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 죄형법정주의 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공소시효 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 소급효금지의 원칙 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 일사부재리 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Sookmyung Women's University. Cheongpa-ro 47-gil 100 (Cheongpa-dong 2ga), Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Korea02-710-9127
Copyright©Sookmyung Women's University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.