Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

<한글 맞춤법> 해설(2018)에 대하여On the Official Commentary of the Revised Korean Orthography in 2017

Other Titles
On the Official Commentary of the Revised Korean Orthography in 2017
Authors
이홍식이은경
Issue Date
Sep-2021
Publisher
우리말글학회
Keywords
Hangeul; orthography; sound; commentary; grammar; original form; 한글; 맞춤법; 소리; 어법; 해설; 원형
Citation
우리말글, v.90, pp 25 - 58
Pages
34
Journal Title
우리말글
Volume
90
Start Page
25
End Page
58
URI
https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/146385
DOI
10.18628/urimal.90..202109.25
ISSN
1229-9200
Abstract
본고는 한글 맞춤법의 해설인 국립국어원(2018)을 국어연구소(1988)과 비교해서 어떤 차이가 있는지 검토했다. 한글 맞춤법 규정은 1988년 고시와 2017년 고시가 큰 차이가 없다. 부분적으로 변한 규범을 반영해서 수정한 것 외에는 큰 틀에서는 차이가 없다. 그러나 해설은 1988년의 해설과 2018년의 해설이 규정의 변화에 비해서는 변화의 폭이 크다고 할 수 있다. 1988년의 해설은 전문적인 언어학 용어의 사용을 통한 학문적 설명에 치중했다면 2018년의 해설은 상대적으로 쉬운 표현을 통해 언중들에게 본문 규정을 이해시키려고 했다. 해설의 텍스트 구성을 둘로 나누어서 조금 더 전문적인 내용이나 부연 설명할 내용은 ‘더 알아보기’에서 다루었다. 용어에 대한 설명은 ‘더 알아보기’로 옮겨서 기술하였다. 또한 표를 사용해서 시각적으로 독자들이 쉽게 본문의 내용을 확인할 수 있도록 했다. 88년 해설에서 총칙 제1항의 ‘소리대로’와 ‘어법에 맞도록’을 원칙과 조건으로 이해했다면 18년 해설에서는 전자와 후자 모두 원칙으로 판단하였다. 구체적인 조항에서는 장황한 기술을 간략하게 바꾸는 방향으로 해설을 수정했다. 기존 해설이 언어학적인 설명을 위해 방만한 내용으로 구성되었다면 이해하기 쉽게 하위 주제별로 텍스트를 구성해서 제시한 경우가 많았다.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the difference between the National Institute of Korean Language (2018), a commentary of Korean spelling, and the Korean Language Institute (1988), a commentary of Korean spelling. The Korean spelling rules do not differ much between the 1988 version and the 2017 version. There is no difference in the framework except for the modification of partially changed norms. However, the commentary in 1988 and the commentary in 2018 can be said to have a wide range of changes compared to the changes in regulations. While 1988's commentary focused on academic explanations of the regulations through the use of professional linguistic terms, 2018's commentary tried to make users understand the writing regulations through relatively easy expressions. However, the use of terminology has not been significantly reduced due to the limitations in easily conveying theoretical explanations of the content of spelling. The text structure of the 1988's commentary was divided into two, rules and the explanation about the rules. The text structure of the 2018's commentary was also divided into two but some of the explanations have additional annotations. the 2018 commentary provides some tables to help readers to understand rules easily. There is a change of perspective between the 1988 commentary and the 2018 commentary about the article 1 of the general rule. In the former the principle of Korean orthography is phonemic writing and the morphological consideration is a kind of condition of the principle. However according to the 2018 commentary there are two principles in Korean orthography, Those are the phonemic writing and the morpho-phonemic writing. Compared to the 1988 commentary, the 2018 commentary has changed briefly and has changed to be easier to understand. Compared to the description of the 1988 commentary, the description of the 2018 commentary has changed to be easier to understand. However, if there is a problem with the contents of the text, there is no room for full improvement in the commentary, so it is not better than the commentary in 1988.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
문과대학 > 한국어문학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yi, Hong Shik photo

Yi, Hong Shik
문과대학 (한국어문학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE