A new TCP for persistent packet reordering
- Authors
- Bohacek, S; Hespanha, JP; Lee, J; Lim, C; Obraczka, K
- Issue Date
- Apr-2006
- Publisher
- IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
- Keywords
- congestion control; packet reordering; transport protocols
- Citation
- IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, v.14, no.2, pp 369 - 382
- Pages
- 14
- Journal Title
- IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
- Volume
- 14
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 369
- End Page
- 382
- URI
- https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/15158
- DOI
- 10.1109/TNET.2006.873366
- ISSN
- 1063-6692
1558-2566
- Abstract
- Most standard implementations of TCP perform poorly when packets are reordered. In this paper, we propose a new version of TCP that maintains high throughput when reordering occurs and yet, when packet reordering does not occur, is friendly to other versions of TCP. The proposed TCP variant, or TCP-PR, does not rely on duplicate acknowledgments to detect a packet loss. Instead, timers are maintained to keep track of how long ago a packet was transmitted. In case the corresponding acknowledgment has not yet arrived and the elapsed time since the packet was sent is larger than a given threshold, the packet is assumed lost. Because TCP-PR does not rely on duplicate acknowledgments, packet reordering (including out-or-order acknowledgments) has no effect on TCP-PR's performance. Through extensive simulations, we show that TCP-PR performs consistently better than existing mechanisms that try to make TCP more robust to packet reordering. In the case that packets are not reordered, we verify that TCP-PR maintains the same throughput as typical implementations of TCP (specifically, TCP-SACK) and shares network resources fairly. Furthermore, TCP-PR only requires changes to the TCP sender side making it easier to deploy.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 이과대학 > 컴퓨터과학부 > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.