A Benchmark Comparison of Four Off-the-Shelf Proprietary Visual-Inertial Odometry Systems
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Pyojin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jungha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, Minkyeong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yeoeun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Moonkyeong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyeong-Geun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-08T07:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-08T07:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-3210 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/152266 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Commercial visual-inertial odometry (VIO) systems have been gaining attention as cost-effective, off-the-shelf, six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) ego-motion-tracking sensors for estimating accurate and consistent camera pose data, in addition to their ability to operate without external localization from motion capture or global positioning systems. It is unclear from existing results, however, which commercial VIO platforms are the most stable, consistent, and accurate in terms of state estimation for indoor and outdoor robotic applications. We assessed four popular proprietary VIO systems (Apple ARKit, Google ARCore, Intel RealSense T265, and Stereolabs ZED 2) through a series of both indoor and outdoor experiments in which we showed their positioning stability, consistency, and accuracy. After evaluating four popular VIO sensors in challenging real-world indoor and outdoor scenarios, Apple ARKit showed the most stable and high accuracy/consistency, and the relative pose error was a drift error of about 0.02 m per second. We present our complete results as a benchmark comparison for the research community. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.title | A Benchmark Comparison of Four Off-the-Shelf Proprietary Visual-Inertial Odometry Systems | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | Switzerland | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/s22249873 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85144570723 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000904525800001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SENSORS, v.22, no.24 | - |
dc.citation.title | SENSORS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 22 | - |
dc.citation.number | 24 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Chemistry | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Instruments & Instrumentation | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Chemistry, Analytical | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Electrical & Electronic | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Instruments & Instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | visual navigation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | visual-inertial odometry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Apple ARKit | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Google ARCore | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | VIO | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Sookmyung Women's University. Cheongpa-ro 47-gil 100 (Cheongpa-dong 2ga), Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Korea02-710-9127
Copyright©Sookmyung Women's University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.