Comparative Research on the Right to Education of Children with Disabilities - Focusing on the FAPE under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District -장애학생의 교육을 받을 권리에 대한 비교법적 고찰 –미국 장애인교육법의 무료의 적절한 공교육에 관한 Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District 사건을 중심으로–
- Other Titles
- 장애학생의 교육을 받을 권리에 대한 비교법적 고찰 –미국 장애인교육법의 무료의 적절한 공교육에 관한 Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District 사건을 중심으로–
- Authors
- 유은정
- Issue Date
- Jan-2019
- Publisher
- 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- Keywords
- 장애아동; 특수교육; 무상의 적절한 공교육; 사법심사; 교육을 받을 권리; Children with disabilities; special education; free and appropriate public education; judicial review; right to education
- Citation
- 법학논총, v.43, pp 197 - 218
- Pages
- 22
- Journal Title
- 법학논총
- Volume
- 43
- Start Page
- 197
- End Page
- 218
- URI
- https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/1918
- DOI
- 10.35867/ssulri.2019.43..008
- ISSN
- 1975-0005
- Abstract
- In Korea, Act on Special Education for Persons with Disabilities guarantees free education for infants with disabilities, but guarantees only compulsory education for disabled children. In addition, the right to education of children with disabilities in Korea is unclear compared to the equivalent U.S. law, which guarantees a free and appropriate public education for children with disabilities. Although the United States Supreme Court has not made clear the criteria for determining "appropriate education", the appropriate education for children with disabilities has been found and based on the assumption that disabled children integrated in general classrooms have challenging goals as children without disabilities do so by the Court. The substantive content of the right to appropriate education has been inferred from not only the purpose and general provisions of the Special Education Act but also from the procedural guarantees of Individualized Education Program(IEP) of the qualified child with disabilities. As in the U.S., education rights for disabled people in Korea are also formed and guaranteed through laws. Therefore, in the statutory law, the right to receive a free education of a child with a disability should be guaranteed to be practical, and the various and detailed procedures of relief and dispute settlement procedure shall be guaranteed so that this right can be exercised as a concrete right rather than a nominal.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 법과대학 > 법학부 > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.