Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Study on the Subject Matter Limitations on Direct Democracy Measures in the U.S. - With the Implications upon Korean Residents Voting System -미국의 직접민주주의 방편의 주제관련 제한에 관한 소고 - 한국의 주민투표제도에 대한 시사점의 모색 -

Other Titles
미국의 직접민주주의 방편의 주제관련 제한에 관한 소고 - 한국의 주민투표제도에 대한 시사점의 모색 -
Authors
유은정
Issue Date
Sep-2017
Publisher
숭실대학교 법학연구소
Keywords
직접민주주의; 주민발안; 다수주의; 숙의의 결여; 주제제한; direct democracy; citizen initiative; majoritarian rule; lack of deliberation; subject matter limitation
Citation
법학논총, v.39, pp 103 - 133
Pages
31
Journal Title
법학논총
Volume
39
Start Page
103
End Page
133
URI
https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/2273
ISSN
1975-0005
Abstract
The most important benefit of direct democracy measures in the United States is that it brings accountability into the representative structure of the government whose accountability is undermined by the faulty election system and an inherent problem with the theory and practice of representation. However, defects in direct democracy undermine the system, leading to demoralizing effects in the voting process and the implementation of this system. Many commentators have proposed suggestions to make the direct democracy voting educative, participatory, deliberative, and capable of reflecting the majority will of the people. However, recognizing that procedural reform is necessary but cannot, by itself, guarantee the protection of democratic and constitutional values, this article discusses the structural and substantive contextualization of direct democracy measures in particular limitations related to subject matter in initiative law making. Subject matter related limitation on initiatives should be devised and introduced carefully due to the possibility of unconstitutionality and misuse of citizen law making. Addressing the defects in the structure and procedure of direct democracy would make it more effective and proper subjects and general policy initiative is recommendable. Direct democracy is also valuable in that it opens a channel for the people who could not achieve their social policy through the ordinary passage of legislature. Korean residents voting do have subject matter limitations as well. Some subject matter limitations on citizen initiatives are recommended but with caution in order not to bring about detrimental effect on the local direct democracy measures which are the very grassroots democracy.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
법과대학 > 법학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yoo, Eun Jung photo

Yoo, Eun Jung
법과대학 (법학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE