Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

낭만주의 생태비평과 새

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author전세재-
dc.date.available2021-02-22T11:11:33Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-
dc.identifier.issn1598-5431-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/8098-
dc.description.abstractRomantic Ecocriticism and Birds The purpose of this paper is to examine the ecological criticism on romantic poetry. One of the major and influential ecocritical impulses on romantic poetry pays emphasis on the deep ecological aspects which explore more or less aesthetical and emotional responses towards between nature and the humans. However, this critical impulse seems to undermine what romantic poets dialogically exchange their views on how to understand natural objects without colonizing them cognitively. In particular, the poems on a nightingale which Samuel Taylor Coleridge, John Keats, and John Clare compose respectively interestingly deal with the tension between the ecological fact and the poetic license which allows the manipulation of the fact to achieve the poetic effects. In “To the Nightingale" and "Nightingale", Coleridge attempts to rectify the cultural manipulation of a nightingale as a response to John Milton's nightingale poems. John Keats's "Ode to a Nightingale", which is traditionally understood as a poem of tension between the mortality and immortality. Compared with Coleridge's attitude to the natural objects, Keats shows the limits which Coleridge fails to overcome. Distinguishably, John Clare in “Nightingale's Nest” tries to approach the natural objects, in an ecologically correct way, which is subtly balanced with poeticization of the natural objects. It must be noted that the errors Coleridge and Keats make are not the poetic error but the ecological error and it is possible to argue that a poet is not a scientist and the poem does not have to be ecologically correct. However if attempts is made to examine ecological aspects of the poems, the distinction between poetic license and ecological errors must be made.-
dc.format.extent22-
dc.language한국어-
dc.language.isoKOR-
dc.publisher한국영미문화학회-
dc.title낭만주의 생태비평과 새-
dc.title.alternativeRomantic Ecocriticism and Birds-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation영미문화, v.7, no.3, pp 323 - 344-
dc.citation.title영미문화-
dc.citation.volume7-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage323-
dc.citation.endPage344-
dc.identifier.kciidART001229433-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskciCandi-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRomanticism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoranimals-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornightingale-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEcocriticism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSamuel Taylor Coleridge-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorJohn Keats-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorJohn Clare-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRomanticism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoranimals-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornightingale-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEcocriticism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSamuel Taylor Coleridge-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorJohn Keats-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorJohn Clare-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=2655246-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
영어영문학부(대학) > 영어영문학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Chun, Seh Jae photo

Chun, Seh Jae
영어영문학부(대학) (영어영문학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE