Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

각국의 국가생명윤리관련위원회 규정을 통한 우리의 국가생명윤리심의위원회 개선 방안Methods to Improve Our National Bioethics Deliberative Council through the Regulations of Relative National Bioethics Councils in the Western Countries

Other Titles
Methods to Improve Our National Bioethics Deliberative Council through the Regulations of Relative National Bioethics Councils in the Western Countries
Authors
박수헌
Issue Date
Nov-2007
Publisher
안암법학회
Keywords
국가생명윤리심의위원회; 적법절차; 국가생명윤리자문위원회; 대통령생명윤리위원회; 인간유전체위원회; 국가윤리위원회; 건강과 생명과학에 관한 국가자문윤리위원회; National Bioethics Deliberative Council; due process; National Bioethics Advisory Committee; President' s Council of Bioethics; Human Genetics Commission; National Ethics Council; National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Science; National Bioethics Deliberative Council; due process; National Bioethics Advisory Committee; President' s Council of Bioethics; Human Genetics Commission; National Ethics Council; National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Science
Citation
안암법학, v.25, pp.203 - 233
Journal Title
안암법학
Volume
25
Start Page
203
End Page
233
URI
https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/8326
ISSN
1226-6159
Abstract
The Bioethics and Safety Act of 2005 established the National Bioethics Deliberative Council (hereinafter NBDC) to deliberate the issues on bioethics and safety in the area of life science and biotechnology. NBDC has been expected to address the most controversial topics on bioethics and safety with due process, including the transparency of resolving process, use of expertise for reasonable resolution, and attainment of democratic resolution through receiving the various opinions. However, it went to the opposite way and got severe criticism. Most of all, the composition of the members of it was the target of criticism. It also has other problems such as the problem of using deliberation in its name, the vagueness of its purpose, the need to supplement the role and functions of it, and the need to establish the supportive office including staffs. In order to give some advices and to find methods for solving these problems, the relevant bioethics councils of several advanced countries including US, UK, Germany, and France were examined in this article. After several trial and errors, they have made their own councils be the center of solving the issues on bioethics and safety through the cooperation and communication with the experts and the public. Therefore, this article tries to derive some beneficial aspects from these councils. Then, some recommendations to improve the role and functions of our NBDC will be given.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
법과대학 > 법학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE