대면과 비대면 의사소통능력 비교
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 임재민 | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22T11:29:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-554X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/9923 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 交流方式主要有两种,是面对面交流与非面对面交流。在课堂教学中,面对面交流是最常见的沟通方式,而随着ICT技术的不断发展和普及,非面对面工具的应用得到越来越多的重视。为验证非面对面交流方式的可行性、可用性、有效性,在课堂上,我们设计了面对面与非面对面活动,根据收集的口语资料,对影响沟通的因素进行比较分析,从而得出以下结果。身体语言能促进情感信息的交流,也有利于提高信息传递的准确性。因此,在面对面交流中,学生还能配合身体语言给对方讲解。然而,在非面对面交流中,学生不仅无法了解对方的情况,也没法得到对方的非语言信息。这都会给学生增加心理压力,结果导致任务失败。在课堂教学中,运用非面对面方法有一定的好处,也有一定的局限性。非面对面方法的运用,有利于提高发音的精确度。同时也起到提高学生的听力能力和培养语言运用能力。但是,非面对面方法有一定的难度,在遇到问题时,可能无法进行下去或者会感到无力。 | - |
dc.format.extent | 23 | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
dc.publisher | 한국중국언어학회 | - |
dc.title | 대면과 비대면 의사소통능력 비교 | - |
dc.title.alternative | a Comparison of communicative competence between direct contact and indirect contact | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | South Korea | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 중국언어연구, no.62, pp 217 - 239 | - |
dc.citation.title | 중국언어연구 | - |
dc.citation.number | 62 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 217 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 239 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002084200 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 面对面 非面对面 语义协商 交际策略 语用失误 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=3425073 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Sookmyung Women's University. Cheongpa-ro 47-gil 100 (Cheongpa-dong 2ga), Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Korea02-710-9127
Copyright©Sookmyung Women's University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.