ScholarWorks@숙명여자대학교

초록

In this study, I have taken into consideration of method of Gobayashi Hideo criticism which has been appraised as a real critic at the beginning of modern Japan critic. In particular, I have explored an internal logic structure of his criticism through such keywords as <a poem><self-consciousness><language> targeting at early criticism based upon 『various thoughts』. Gobayashi's criticism is closely related to a <poem>. The criticism that Gobayashi pursued of as a realistic object is a poetic prose that he would like to express <the world before conception> as a language, not concept nor object through poetic intuition. In addition, such criticism doesn't belong either to <dream> or <incredulity>, instead it is an action of practice that aims at putting both on a maximized state in a dialectical way of thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Core curriculum that supports this type of criticism is, most of all, critic's own <self-consciousness>. According to Gobayashi, self-consciousness is conscious ness of era, and that of goal. In other words, Gobayashi's bold practice of criticism is based upon confirmation about his or her own <self-consciousness> that makes himself or herself conscious of object. Accordingly, regardless of antisocial and humanitarian criticism about that of Gobayashi, such criticism centered upon a critic's self-consciousness cannot but comprize ideational and vague expression. Therefore, judgment about such criticism is not a matter of "should or must", but that of "select". In this sense, what seems the most important, once again, cannot but recur to the issue of thesis-synthesis of internal logic of Gobayashi's criticism.

키워드