ScholarWorks@숙명여자대학교

초록

The purpose of this paper is to examine the difference between the National Institute of Korean Language (2018), a commentary of Korean spelling, and the Korean Language Institute (1988), a commentary of Korean spelling. The Korean spelling rules do not differ much between the 1988 version and the 2017 version. There is no difference in the framework except for the modification of partially changed norms. However, the commentary in 1988 and the commentary in 2018 can be said to have a wide range of changes compared to the changes in regulations. While 1988's commentary focused on academic explanations of the regulations through the use of professional linguistic terms, 2018's commentary tried to make users understand the writing regulations through relatively easy expressions. However, the use of terminology has not been significantly reduced due to the limitations in easily conveying theoretical explanations of the content of spelling. The text structure of the 1988's commentary was divided into two, rules and the explanation about the rules. The text structure of the 2018's commentary was also divided into two but some of the explanations have additional annotations. the 2018 commentary provides some tables to help readers to understand rules easily. There is a change of perspective between the 1988 commentary and the 2018 commentary about the article 1 of the general rule. In the former the principle of Korean orthography is phonemic writing and the morphological consideration is a kind of condition of the principle. However according to the 2018 commentary there are two principles in Korean orthography, Those are the phonemic writing and the morpho-phonemic writing. Compared to the 1988 commentary, the 2018 commentary has changed briefly and has changed to be easier to understand. Compared to the description of the 1988 commentary, the description of the 2018 commentary has changed to be easier to understand. However, if there is a problem with the contents of the text, there is no room for full improvement in the commentary, so it is not better than the commentary in 1988.

키워드