ScholarWorks@숙명여자대학교

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the risk and protective factors on the Non PTSS group, PTSS only group, PTSS and depression group, and the PTSS and drinking group. In this study, there were 1,691 participants experiencing natural disasters and recruited as a part of ‘Disaster Victim Panel Survey (wave 3)’ collected by the National Disaster Management Research Institute. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the effects of risk and protective factors on the PTSS groups using the SPSS Statistics Program 23 version. First, ‘trauma severity’, ‘property damage’, ‘physical illness’ before the disaster and ‘disaster-related conflict’ significantly increased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS only group, compared to the Non PTSS group. Higher ‘Individual resilience’ and higher after disaster ‘monthly incomes’ significantly decreased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS only group. Second, ‘trauma severity’, ‘property damage’ and ‘disaster-related conflict’ significantly increased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS depression group, compared to the Non PTSS group. Higher ‘individual resilience’, higher ‘community resilience’ and higher after disaster ‘monthly incomes’ significantly decreased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS depression group. Third, higher ‘trauma severity’, ‘property damage’, ‘disaster-related conflict’ and ‘gender(male)’ significantly increased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS drinking group, compared to Non PTSS group. Higher ‘perceived social support’ and higher after disaster ‘monthly incomes’ significantly decreased the likelihood of belonging to the PTSS drinking group.

키워드