ScholarWorks@숙명여자대학교

초록

This study compares the national qualification systems for vocational counselors in Korea and career consultants in Japan to identify improvements for Korea's system. Despite shared socio-economic contexts, the two systems differ in structure, evaluation, and application. Using the Structured-Focused Comparison (SFC) method, the study analyzes legal foundations, tier systems, exam methods, and renewal procedures. Focus Group Interviews ensured validity. Findings reveal that while both systems are state-led, Japan emphasizes employee career development and requires certification renewal and ongoing training. In contrast, Korea focuses on job-seeking support without mandatory renewal. The study recommends enhancing Korea's assessment system, introducing advanced qualification levels, and implementing a structured renewal process.

키워드