2004년 영국의 「인체조직법」과 원주민 유해 반환
Human Tissue Act 2004 and the Repatriation of Human Remains in Museums of the UK
  • 장예나
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

0
Citations

SCOPUS

0

초록

In the 1990s, the event of children’s tissues, organs, and body parts autopsied after death being kept in Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital and Bristol Royal Infirmary was revealed. This “Alder Hey Organ Scandal” became an issue because no parental consent had been acquired. As a result, the Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted to solve medical and social problems related to preserving tissues, organs, and body parts in hospitals. Section 47 of the Human Tissue Act of 2004, which consists of three parts and 61 sections, specifies “power to de-accession human remains.” The Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted to solve the problem that First Australians’ remains, First Nations’ remains, tsantsa (shrunken head), and Toi Moko of New Zealand had been displayed and stored in museums, galleries, universities, hospitals, and medical institutions in the UK. Repatriating the remains of Indigenous individuals to their Indigenous community was difficult as a result of the British Museum Act of 1963. After the Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted, the remains of Indigenous people could be repatriated. This paper shows how First Australians’ remains stored in the UK’s famous museum were properly buried, curated, preserved, exhibited, and returned through Section 47 of the Human Tissue Act of 2004.

키워드

Human Tissue Act 2004British Museum Acthuman remainsrepatriation2004년 인체조직법1963년 영국박물관법인간 유해반환
제목
2004년 영국의 「인체조직법」과 원주민 유해 반환
제목 (타언어)
Human Tissue Act 2004 and the Repatriation of Human Remains in Museums of the UK
저자
장예나
DOI
10.35276/yjmh.2023.26.2.301
발행일
2023-12
저널명
연세의사학
26
2
페이지
301 ~ 324