Eliciting Public Preference for Health-Care Resource Allocation in South Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Min Kyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Eun Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Sang-Eun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Eui Kyung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Tae-Jin | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22T12:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-3015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1524-4733 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/12006 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To identify the principles the public considers important and the trade-offs between different values in health-care resource allocation practices. Methods: This study approached the issue in both qualitative and quantitative ways. In a qualitative study, two focus groups discussed the issues of resource allocation in health care. To facilitate the discussion, a simple ranking task and a series of pairwise choice practices were implemented. A discrete choice experiment survey questionnaire was also administered to a sample of the general population. Attributes and levels were determined through literature reviews and the results from the focus group interview. We used a random-effect probit model to assess the effects of each attribute. Results: Through the focus group interviews, we found strong public support for the principle of equal opportunity. The participants thought that the severity of disease was the most important criterion when setting priorities. The majority supported the idea that the most disadvantaged should have the highest priority even when their health gains are less than those of others. The discrete choice experiment results showed that the severity of disease, health gains, and patients' socioeconomic status significantly influence their choices, with each parameter having an expected sign. Conclusion: The results showed that Koreans support not only health maximization but also equal opportunity, fair resource allocation, and equality. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | - |
dc.title | Eliciting Public Preference for Health-Care Resource Allocation in South Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.014 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84862921874 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000299317000016 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | VALUE IN HEALTH, v.15, no.1, pp S91 - S94 | - |
dc.citation.title | VALUE IN HEALTH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | S91 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | S94 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Health Care Sciences & Services | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Health Care Sciences & Services | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Health Policy & Services | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SOCIAL VALUE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EQUITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | discrete choice experiments | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | focus group interviews | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | priority setting | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | social value | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Sookmyung Women's University. Cheongpa-ro 47-gil 100 (Cheongpa-dong 2ga), Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Korea02-710-9127
Copyright©Sookmyung Women's University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.