Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Household use of agricultural chemicals for soil-pest management and own labor for yard work

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTempleton, SR-
dc.contributor.authorZilberman, D-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorDabalen, AL-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T11:04:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-19T11:04:17Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07-
dc.identifier.issn09246460-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/148214-
dc.description.abstractIn spite of its potential health and environmental risks and contribution to agri-business, the use of agricultural chemicals for yard care has not been well studied. In our discrete-continuous choice model, estimated with data from a national survey, a household chooses how much money, if any, to initially spend on types of agricultural chemicals and applicators and how much time to subsequently spend on other yard work. Households in big cities or with large gardens are more likely to use organic chemicals. The probability that a household chooses a mix of do-it-yourself and hired applications of synthetic chemicals increases with income, age, and the presence of preschoolers. Among households that apply only synthetic chemicals without hired help, those with young children, with higher incomes, in big cities, and with male heads spend more on the chemicals. The time that such households spend on other yard work increases with expenditures on the chemicals. Cancellation of a pesticide registration might create an extra private cost for households with young children even though the ban might reduce external costs.-
dc.format.extent18-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.titleHousehold use of agricultural chemicals for soil-pest management and own labor for yard work-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10640-007-9142-3-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-42149154823-
dc.identifier.wosid000255414200005-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, v.40, no.1, pp 91 - 108-
dc.citation.titleENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS-
dc.citation.volume40-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage91-
dc.citation.endPage108-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAgricultural chemicals-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDiscrete-continuous choice model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDo-it-yourself application-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFertilizers-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHired application-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHousehold model of consumption and production-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLawn and garden-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOrganic chemicals-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPesticides-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRandom utility model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSynthetic chemicals-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
TESOL·국제학대학원 > 기후환경융합학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yoo, Seung Jick photo

Yoo, Seung Jick
TESOL·국제학대학원 (기후환경융합학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE