ScholarWorks@Sookmyung Women's University: Kim, Min Chi

Detailed Information

Kim, Min Chi (김민지)

Social Sciences (Department of Social Psychology)

Research Area: 법적 의사결정, 유죄 오판, 전문가의 법정 증언 효과, Legal Decision Making, wrongful conviction, expert testimony

Tel 02-2077-7684
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

처벌판단:5||National Security:4||미란다 경고:3||South Korea:3||crime statistics:3||mass media:3||stereotype:3||punitive judgement:3||이해도:3||perception:2||sex offender:2||gender:2||피의자 권리 고지:2||Interrogation:2||사건 판단:2||Public Safety:2||아동학대:2||case judgment:2||punitive judgment:2||허위 자백:2||TRS:2||고정관념:2||성별:2||Modus Operandi:2||false confession:2||Prevention:2||오판:2||criminal justice system:2||처벌 판단:2||국가안보:2||국민안전:2||미란다 퀴즈:2||PSLTE:2||신문:2||미성년 피의자:2||Fear of Crime:1||Forensic Science:1||France:1||HiTech Crime:1||Historical:1||Historical Perspectives:1||Hostile Sexism:1||Housebreaking:1||Human Rights:1||Identity Protection Law:1||Illegal Operation:1||Illegal Parking and Stopping:1||In Vehicle Network:1||Industry Secret Information:1||Industry Security:1||Industry Security Leaks:1||Information Security System:1||Insider Information Leakage:1||Institutional betrayal:1||Intellectual Disability of Victim:1||Internet of Things (IoT):1||Interview:1||Issue:1||Juror’s Gender:1||Korean citizen participation trial:1||Labor Right:1||Law Enforcement:1||Leakage:1||Legal Consciousness:1||Legal Socialization:1||Level of Educational:1||Lie Detection:1||Management System:1||Maritime Government Power:1||Military violence:1||Miranda Comprehension:1||Miranda Decision:1||Miranda Quiz:1||Miranda Warnings:1||Miranda rights:1||Miranda warnings:1||Miscarriages:1||Mock Juror’s Gender:1||National Assembly:1||National Defensive System:1||National Security Law:1||New Labour:1||North Korean Defectors:1||Notification of rights:1||Objective and Subjective Comprehension:1||Parenting Attitudes:1||Perceived Stress:1||Phishing:1||Physical Abuse:1||Physical Security:1||Police:1||Police Contacts:1||Police Malpractice:1||Policy:1||Policy Implication:1||Preventing Hacking Attacks:1||Procedural Justice:1||Process:1||Pubic Tour System:1||Punishment Judgments:1||Rational Choice:1||Reading Level:1||Reid Technique:1||Routine Activity Theory:1||Safer Community:1||Safety:1||SelfProtective Behavior:1||Sex Offender’s Punishment:1||Sexual Assault Case:1||Shipbuilding Company:1||Single Person Household:1||Situational Crime Prevention:1||Smishing:1||Special Security Guards:1||Standard of proof:1||Statement Credibility:1||Stress:1||The Act on Protection of Specific Crime Informants:1||Trend:1||Trial Stage:1||Trust in the military:1||Victim Resistance:1||Voice Phishing:1||Witness:1||Wrongful Conviction:1||Youth Justice:1||abnormal mental state due to childbirth:1||abuse crime:1||abuse of persons with disabilities:1||acceptability of violence:1||adolescent suspect:1||amount of settlement:1||categories of selfdefense:1||character evidence:1||child abuse:1||common sense standard of decision:1||comprehension:1||comprehension of rights:1||confession:1||crime:1||crime seriousness:1||crime type:1||crime victim:1||criminal justice procedure:1||criminal settlement:1||criminals:1||criticism:1||dating violence:1||defendantvictim relationship:1||delayed reporting:1||donotask crime:1||expert testimony:1||eyewitness misidentification:1||false rape allegation:1||foreign criminal:1||forensic evaluation report:1||forensic science evidence.:1||forgiveness:1||gender role stereotypes:1||illegal behavior:1||infanticide:1||intellectual disability:1||internationality judgment:1||interrogation duration:1||interrogation techniques:1||intrafamilial sexual violence:1||judicial instruction:1||juror decisionmaking:1||lawyer:1||legal attitudes questionnaire(LAQ):1||legal decisions:1||legal terminology.:1||level of punishment:1||lineal ascendant victim:1||lineal descendant victim:1||mediating effect:1||motiveless crime:1||nationality:1||negative perceptions of delayed reporting:1||nonspecific motive crime:1||offendervictim relationship:1||outing:1||participant’s gender:1||physical violence:1||plea bargaining:1||prosecutor:1||psychological violence:1||public figure:1||public perceptions:1||qualitative evaluation criteria:1||rate of selfdefense recognition in news article:1||reasonable doubt:1||responsibility judgement:1||selfdefense judgment:1||sentence judgment:1||sentence reduction:1||sentence reduction for cooperating witness:1||sentencing judgment:1||sexual abuse:1||sexual assertiveness:1||sexual minority:1||sexual violence:1||shadow jury:1||spouse insurance homicide offense:1||statement analysis:1||stereotypic crime:1||subjective motivation:1||substantial truth:1||unwillingness to punish:1||violence tolerance:1||violent crime:1||wrongful conviction:1||wrongful convictions:1||가해자 처벌판단:1||가해자피해자 관계:1||감형:1||강간 무고:1||강력범죄:1||개정 전․후 범죄피해자 권리 안내문:1||객관적 및 주관적 이해도:1||거짓말 탐지:1||검사:1||경찰:1||경찰에 대한 태도:1||경찰위법행위:1||경찰접촉:1||고정관념적 범죄:1||공인(公人):1||공인의 위법행위:1||국가대응체계:1||국가보안법:1||국민참여재판:1||국적:1||권리 고지:1||그림자배심원:1||기밀유출:1||긴급통신망시스템:1||노동인권:1||대중매체:1||데이트폭력:1||동성관계:1||리드 기법:1||면담:1||모의 배심원 성별:1||목격자 오인 지목:1||무동기 범죄:1||무질서모델:1||문제점:1||문화배양이론:1||문화적:1||묻지마 범죄:1||미국:1||미란다 이해도:1||미란다 판결:1||배심원 성별:1||배우자 보험살인:1||범죄:1||범죄 통계:1||범죄두려움:1||범죄에 대한 두려움:1||범죄예방:1||범죄유형:1||범죄의 고의성:1||범죄의 심각성:1||범죄자:1||범죄전이:1||범죄통계:1||범죄피해자:1||범죄피해자 권리 및 지원제도 안내서:1||범죄학적:1||법과학:1||법과학 증거:1||법률용어:1||법사회화:1||법심리학 평가 보고서:1||법의식:1||법적 태도:1||법집행:1||변호인:1||북한이탈주민:1||불법어업:1||불법주정차:1||비난:1||비속 피해자:1||사법협조자 형벌감면제도:1||사산:1||사이버테러:1||산모의 비정상적 정신상태:1||산업보안:1||상황적 범죄예방:1||성 역할 고정관념:1||성격 증거:1||성범죄자:1||성적자기주장:1||성적폭력:1||성차:1||성폭력 사건:1||성폭력피해:1||소년사법:1||스트레스:1||신고 지연 기간:1||신고 지연에 대한 부정적 인식:1||신노동당:1||신문기사의 정당방위 인정비율:1||신원보호법:1||신체적 학대:1||신체적폭력:1||실체적 진실:1||실태:1||심리적폭력:1||아동 성범죄:1||아웃팅:1||안전한 지역사회:1||양육태도:1||양형 판단:1||양형판단:1||언론 매체:1||역사적:1||역사적 관점:1||영국:1||영국형사사법시스템:1||영아살해죄:1||외국인 범죄:1||용서:1||유죄협상제도:1||이상동기 범죄:1||일반인들의 인식:1||일상활동이론:1||읽기 수준:1||자기보호행동:1||장애인학대:1||재판단계:1||재해 및 재난상황:1||적대적 성차별의식:1||전문가 증언:1||절차적 공정성:1||정당방위 유형:1||정당방위 판단:1||정책:1||정책적 제언:1||조선기업:1||존속 피해자:1||주거침입범죄:1||주관적 동기:1||중국:1||중국어선:1||증인:1||지각된 스트레스:1||지적장애 피해자:1||진술분석:1||진술신빙성:1||질적 평가 기준:1||참고인:1||책임 판단:1||처벌 수준:1||처벌불원:1||청소년:1||출입보안관리:1||취약성가설:1||친족성폭력 범죄:1||태도 인식:1||특정범죄신고자 등 보호법:1||판단자의 성별:1||폭력 허용도:1||폭력허용도:1||프랑스:1||피고인피해자 관계:1||피해아동 연령:1||피해자 저항:1||피해자 지적장애:1||학대 범죄:1||학대원인:1||학력 수준:1||한국:1||합리적 선택:1||해상공권력:1||행동분석 면담:1||허위자백:1||형사사법절차:1||형사사법체계:1||형사사법학:1||형사합의:1||1인가구:1||형사합의금 액수:1||2010 전국범죄피해조사:1||Abuse Risk Factors:1||Access Control Security:1||Adolescents:1||America:1||Attitudes Toward Police:1||Before and After Revision Crime Victims’ Rights Guide:1||Behavioral Analysis Interview:1||Bluetooth:1||Britain:1||British Criminal Justice System:1||Child Maltreatment:1||Child Sexual Assault:1||Child Victim’s Age:1||China:1||Chinese Fishing Boats:1||Company:1||Convergence Security:1||Crime:1||Crime Displacement:1||Crime Prevention:1||Crime Script Analysis:1||Crime Victim’s Rights and Assistance Guide:1||Criminal Jusitce:1||Criminal Justice:1||Criminological:1||Cultural:1||Cyber Terrorism:1||DNA exonerations:1||DNA 분석:1||Disaster Emergency Communication System:1||Disaster Situation:1||Disorder Model:1||False Confession:1||

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

Sookmyung Women's University. Cheongpa-ro 47-gil 100 (Cheongpa-dong 2ga), Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04310, Korea02-710-9127

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE