경제성평가의 국가간 적용가능성 진단도구를 이용한 류마티스관절염 치료제 사례 연구

Abstract

Objectives: With more and more health economic evaluations being performed in many countries, the question of whether the results from the foreign studies can be transferred to other country is becoming important. The objective of this study was to conduct a case study using three transferability diagnosis tools for economic evaluation on rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: Three diagnosis tools were used to assess transferability: Welte’s tool, Boulenger’s and Urdahl’s. Five researchers who have experience on economic evaluation made consensus on the evaluation through the semi-delphi method. Results: With Welte’s tool, absolute and relative prices in healthcare, practice variation, health-status preference, productivity and work-loss time were evaluated as biased. The transferability information score by Boulenger’s was 85.9%, which means qood quality reporting. In case of Urdahl’s, research questions were well defined and reporting was transparent and explicitly stated. However, both the relevance of data inputs to Korea and robustness of model were relatively low. In conclusion the UK study on rheumatoid arthritis could be partially transferable to Korea, and will need modeling-based adjustments.