Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

秦漢 율령사 연구의 제문제The problems of the Qin-Han law research

Other Titles
The problems of the Qin-Han law research
Authors
임중혁
Issue Date
Aug-2015
Publisher
중국고중세사학회
Keywords
律令; 秦令; 漢令; 王杖詔書; 詔書型式; 法典 Laws and Decrees; Decrees of Qin dynasty; Decrees of Han dynasty; Laws on Emperor Cane system; imperial edict style; Corpus Juris; 율령; 진령; 한령; 왕장조서; 조서형식; 법전; Laws and Decrees; Decrees of Qin dynasty; Decrees of Han dynasty; Laws on Emperor Cane system; imperial edict style; Corpus Juris
Citation
중국고중세사연구, no.37, pp 1 - 52
Pages
52
Journal Title
중국고중세사연구
Number
37
Start Page
1
End Page
52
URI
https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/5324
DOI
10.15840/amch.2015..37.001
ISSN
1229-7860
Abstract
战国时期的律大约出现于公元前260年,秦令存在与否则一直颇有争议,岳麓书院藏秦简被发现后才证实其确实存在过。“盗铸钱令”与“钱律”并存,“金布律”与“金布令”并存,对于这种同名的律名和令名混用的原因,一般认为有两个。首先认为律和令的区分不明确,导致对同一所指既可称为律也可称为令。其次,认为令是对律的补充,比如说金布令改称金布律,使两个名称并存。对于称谓混用的原因,本文认为是在部分令改为律的过程中发生的。 学界一般认为魏晋律中的律和令的内涵发生过演化,即律用来专指有关刑罚的法规,令用来规定刑罚以外的,在这一分化过程中原来律中的非刑罚内容归到了令中,于是出现了令这种新的法律形式。但笔者认为律和令这两个概念的分化在秦律令中就已出现,对两者进行严格区分的是魏晋律。
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
문과대학 > 역사문화학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE