Consumption of red and processed meat and esophageal cancer risk: Meta-analysis
- Authors
- Choi, Yuni; Song, Sujin; Song, Yoonju; Lee, Jung Eun
- Issue Date
- 21-Feb-2013
- Publisher
- BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
- Keywords
- Cohort study; Case-control study; Meta-analysis; Red meat; Processed meat; Esophageal cancer
- Citation
- WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, v.19, no.7, pp 1020 - 1029
- Pages
- 10
- Journal Title
- WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Volume
- 19
- Number
- 7
- Start Page
- 1020
- End Page
- 1029
- URI
- https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/11336
- DOI
- 10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.1020
- ISSN
- 1007-9327
2219-2840
- Abstract
- To summarize the evidence about the association between red and processed meat intake and the risk of esophageal cancer, we systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases up to May 2012, with a restriction to English publications, and the references of the retrieved articles. We combined the study-specific relative risks (RRs) and 95% CI, comparing the highest with the lowest categories of consumption by using a random-effects model. A total of 4 cohort studies and 23 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combined RRs (95% CI) of the cohort studies comparing the highest and lowest categories were 1.26 (1.00-1.59) for red meat and 1.25 (0.83-1.86) for processed meat. For the case-control studies, the combined RRs (95% CI) comparing the highest and lowest categories were 1.44 (1.16-1.80) for red meat and 1.36 (1.07-1.74) for processed meat. Findings from this meta-analysis suggest that a higher consumption of red meat was associated with a greater risk of esophageal cancer. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 생활과학대학 > 식품영양학과 > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.