Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 16 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur, and forearm?

Authors
Kim, KIHan, IKKim, HCho, NH
Issue Date
Feb-2001
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
osteoporosis; reliability; ultrasound densitometry
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, v.4, no.2, pp 159 - 165
Pages
7
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY
Volume
4
Number
2
Start Page
159
End Page
165
URI
https://scholarworks.sookmyung.ac.kr/handle/2020.sw.sookmyung/16715
DOI
10.1385/JCD:4:2:159
ISSN
1094-6950
1559-0747
Abstract
Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used noninvasive, quantitative diagnostic method of measuring bone density, but it exhibits several limitations for the purpose of general screening and community-based study. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of the ultrasound densitometer SoundScan Compact for screening the osteoporosis community. We compared the reliability of the SoundScan Compact's measurement to predict both osteopenia and osteoporosis at the spine, femur and forearm measured by the XR-36. World Health Organisation criteria and Korean reference were used for the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis. Of the 1827 subjects screened in the community, we randomly selected and invited 106 subjects to our university hospital center for clinical epidemiology for further evaluation of their bone health using DXA. The site-specific relationships among speed of sound and bone mineral density at L2-L4 spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle, distal radius + ulna, proximal radius + ulna, and proximal radius were highly correlated with r values of 0.633, 0.632, 0.674, 0.632, 0.668, 0.78, and 0.777 respectively (all p < 0.0001). Of the 42 subjects defined as normal in the spine by SoundScan Compact's, 27 (64.3%) were also in agreement as the normal by the XR-36. However, an agreement of 43.5% (10/23) in osteopenia and 53.7% (22/41) in osteoporosis was less sensitive. Reliability tested by <kappa> statistics (kappa = 0.35; t = 5.3; p < 0.0001) revealed that the degree of agreement was not coincidental. On the femur, 54.8% (23/42) agreed as normal, 73.9% (17/23) as osteopenia, and 39% (16/41) as osteoporosis (<kappa> = 0.33; t = 5.5; p < 0.0001). Higher reliability was found in the forearm, with a <kappa> Value of 0.48, t = 7.2, and p < 0.0001. A magnitude of agreement was also greater in the forearm, with 83.3% (35/42) agreement in normal, 52.2% (12/23) in osteopenia, and 64% (16/25) in osteoporosis. Although the SoundScan Compact's measures different bone properties and measurements are taken at different sites, it is a very useful instrument with a high correlation and high degree of variation and reliability to predict bone health at other sites :such as the spine, femur and forearm. The ultrasound densitometer such as SoundScan Compact's merits its use for community screening and in the primary care setting to detect osteopenia and osteoporosis for the purpose of early detection and prevention.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
생활과학대학 > 식품영양학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE